Bizim Chen Hanım Linkedin'de şöyle bir mesaj paylaştı
[NIW Adjudication Trends: Unpacking the Challenges of Emerging Inconsistencies]
The U.S. immigration system, often seen as a maze of rules, policies, and standards, has recently seen a shift in the adjudication of National Interest Waiver petitions. As one of the most sought-after avenues for professionals aspiring to work and live in the U.S., the EB-2 NIW is lauded for its flexibility and broad eligibility criteria. However, its recent adjudications have left many perplexed and concerned.
[A Surge in New Officers]
Over the past year, we have observed an influx of new officers stepping into the adjudication role. While new perspectives can bring clarity and refinement, this wave of fresh officers has introduced unexpected inconsistency in decision-making.
[Muddying the Waters: Misunderstood Standards]
-Misapplication of Standards: We've seen officers applying criteria from other immigration categories onto the NIW. This not only deviates from established protocols but complicates an already intricate process.
-Confusing Educational and Professional Criteria: Many decisions show confusion between 'advanced degree' and 'exceptional ability'. For clarity, the EB-2 category either demands an advanced degree or proof of exceptional ability – not both. But several officers are conflating them as concurrent requirements, leading to unwarranted RFEs.
-Geographical Bias and Job Offer Misconceptions: One of the defining features of the NIW is its flexibility regarding the applicant's current geographic location and the absence of a mandatory job offer. However, there appears to be a bias among some officers against applicants residing outside the U.S. or those without formal job offers. This perspective is fundamentally misaligned with the tenets of the NIW.
[North America Immigration Law Group’s Unwavering Commitment to Excellence]
Amidst these challenges, our firm stands as a testament to resilience and expertise. Our deep-rooted understanding of the NIW process has not only allowed us to navigate these turbulent waters but has also ensured that we maintain our exceedingly high approval rate. These shifting landscapes in adjudication serve as a reminder that the world of immigration is ever-evolving. Our strength lies not just in our knowledge, but in our adaptability and relentless pursuit of justice for our clients.
[Implications for Applicants]
With the rise in RFEs, based on the newly-introduced norms, the adjudication process is lengthened, causing undue stress and confusion for applicants.
[Moving Forward]
For the integrity of the U.S. immigration system, it's crucial for USCIS to address these inconsistencies promptly. Adequate training and clearer guidelines can streamline the process for new officers. Meanwhile, applicants and their legal representatives must be ready to tackle any confusion-based decision. The NIW, as a pivotal route for many, deserves precise understanding and correct application.
Özetle: Memurların dosya ve belgeleri incelerken tecrübelerine göre hata yapma ihtimallerinin olduğu ile ilgili. @GÖK hocam bu durumdan müzdarip oldu. Bence belgeleri mümkün olduğunca mühürlü, ingilizce şekilde yollamak ve orjinal olduklarını mühür gibi kanıtlarla vurgulamak önemli. Boşanma ve başka adli durumlarda karar evrakını adliye kaleminden mühürletip ondan sonra çevirtmek daha mantıklı. edevletten alınan qr kodlu belgeler doğrulanabiliyor onların dışındakiler için mühür bence önemli