@MySea, içinde söyledi: DV2021 Goodluck V Biden Davası (Mayıs 2021)
@berke1998, içinde söyledi: DV2021 Goodluck V Biden Davası (Mayıs 2021)
@mahmutkucukyildiz Çok üzülerek söylemeliyim ki artık bir davaya katılamazsınız, ve davaya katılmayanlar için de süreç bitti maalesef, katılanlar da hükümet avukatlarının yersiz çabalarına rağmen yargıcın vermiş olduğu rezerv vizelerden bir umut faydalanmayı bekliyor. Fakat, Biden hükümetinin yıl bitmeden senatoya sunacağı BBB (Build Back Better) tasarısı eğer onaylanırsa, 2017-2021 mali yılları arasında DV vizesi alamayanlar tekrardan vizelerini alabilecek. Yanlışım var ise yöneticiler beni düzeltecektir.
Build Back Better yasasi eger Senatodan oldugu gibi gecip onaylanirsa, evet yazdiginiz dogru.
kanunun ilgili kısmını okudum 2017-2021 arası kazanıp alamayanlardan bahsediyor fakat 2017-2018 için sadece travel ban uygulanan ülkelerdeki kazananlar mı faydalanacak onu tam anlayamadım. çünkü bu forumda da o 2018 de kazanıp gidemeyen onlarca insan oldu. fakat türkiye travel ban ülkesi değil?
2 numaralı kısımda "vize başvurusunda bulunmalarına rağmen(ds260 dolduranları kast ediyorlar sanırım) vize görüşmesi yapamayanlar"
bu kısım dv2018 kazanıp gidemeyen türklere kapı açıyor yanılmıyorsam.
**Sec. 60002 – Diversity Visa Lottery “Recapture”
BBB also would authorize additional green cards for diversity visa lottery winners who failed to receive a green card during fiscal years 2017 through 2021 if:
-
they were refused a visa, denied admission, or prevented from seeking admission because of President Trump’s security/terrorism travel ban orders; or
-
they were unable to receive a visa interview despite submitting a visa application or were unable to seek admission/denied admission to the United States despite being approved for a visa because of COVID‐related visa processing delays.
Unlike the FB and EB recapture, the diversity lottery provisions do not limit the number of diversity lottery green cards that may be issued to immigrants who meet these criteria. In other words, anyone who meets these criteria can qualify, regardless of the number of wasted diversity lottery green cards. In theory, this means that the number of diversity lottery visas under this section could exceed the unused diversity lottery cap slots for those years because the State Department selects more winners than the cap because it predicts that some applicants will not apply to consulates in time or will be disqualified.
With respect to the first group (those banned by Trump’s travel ban orders), there is some ambiguity about how broad a group that this covers. The text refers to three groups 1) those “refused a visa” (meaning those who applied at a consulate and were denied), 2) those “denied admission” (meaning those who received a visa but were turned away at a U.S. port of entry), and finally 3) those “prevented from seeking admission.” This exact phrase has never appeared in immigration law and is not defined in the bill. “Seeking admission” simply means trying to legally enter the United States, so it could refer to only those who have received a visa but were denied boarding a plane, or it could refer to any action by the government to “prevent” them from seeking admission (no matter how far removed from the actual action of seeking admission at a port). This is important because many applicants did not show up for visa interviews or did not submit visa applications because they were legally banned from coming to the country, so the broadest interpretation would include any qualified applicant subject to the ban.
The second group (those affected by COVID-19 delays) is more precisely defined to limit it only to those who actually applied for a diversity visa at a consulate after winning the lottery. The State Department does not publish statistics on this, but in 2021, it revealed in a court filing that it received 50,756 applications from lottery winners. This number excludes their spouses and minor children (which it doesn’t centrally track), and there is usually one “derivative” applicant for every primary applicant, so that would imply about 101,000 applicants (out of the 134,425 lottery winners).
Table 3 shows the number of diversity lottery selectees by fiscal year for travel ban countries and overall. From 2017 to 2021, there were 43,326 diversity lottery winners from travel ban countries who did not receive visas. In 2020 and 2021, there were 182,524 diversity lottery winners overall who did not receive visas, which was much higher than the 72,732 unused cap slots in those years. The State Department selected a lot more winners in 2021 than usual because it had so much trouble filling the spots in 2020, which means that given an infinite timeframe, it’s likely that the total cap could be exceeded if anyone who applied could receive a green card (for a comparison to CRS, see note).[9]**
temsilciler meclisinden geçen kanun şu şekilde;
" because of restrictions or limitations on visa processing, visa issuance, travel, or other effects associated with the COVID–19 public health emergency"
yukarıdaki paragrada tam olarak neyi kast ettiklerini anlayamadım. her hangi bir nedenle vize işleme, onaylamada aksaklıktan mı bahsediyor yoksa covid19 ile bağıntılı kısıt yasak ve işleme gecikmelerindne mi?
DIVERSITY VISAS.—
Notwithstanding section 204(a)(1)(I)(ii)(II), an immigrant visa for an alien selected in accordance with section 203(e)(2) in fiscal year 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, or 2021 shall remain available to such alien (and the spouse and children of such alien) if—
‘‘(A) the alien was refused a visa, prevented from seeking admission, or denied admission to the United States solely because of Executive Order 13769, Executive Order 13780, Presidential Proclamation 9645, or Presidential Proclamation 9983; or
‘‘(B) because of restrictions or limitations on visa processing, visa issuance, travel, or other effects associated with the COVID–19 public health emergency—
‘‘(i) the alien was unable to receive a visa interview despite submitting an Online Immigrant Visa and Alien Registration Application (Form DS–260) to the Secretary of State; or
‘‘(ii) the alien was unable to seek admission or was denied admission to the United States despite being approved for a visa under section 203(c).’’.
INA 203
INA204